Still, I'm left with six verses on the "Yes" side to deal with. Some of them I have already commented on briefly in the past, saying that they're really in the wrong column. The passages from Titus and 1Timothy that talk about a "bishop" being "husband of one wife" are making the point that the most spiritually mature people will avoid polygamy. (Many modern churches also interpret this to mean that divorced people should not be pastors.) The verse from Matthew is a cultural misunderstanding, as these "ten virgins" are not brides, but bridesmaids. They're waiting for him not to marry him, but to escort him back to where the wedding feast is being held.
That leaves me with three to explain on the "Yes" side, and at this point, I'll make a statement that may surprise some: I don't believe that polygamy is a sin. While the verses on the "No" side are applicable to polygamy, many of them are really talking more about the sanctity of marriage and the hurt that is caused by divorce. More pointedly, none of them come right out and say, "Thou shalt not have more than one wife." I think polygamy, like divorce, is an institution that the Bible allows, but never really gives approval for. In a perfect relationship, a man would find himself one and only one wife, and he would marry her and stay married to her until one of the two of them dies. However, we don't live in a perfect world, and men are slime. Boo.
Well, among those three remaining verses, I think there are two categories. The excerpt from 2Samuel is more of a statement of fact than an endorsement. David had multiple wives, some of which he had got from Saul, the previous king. I don't know for sure, but it may be possible that rather than David marrying the wives of Saul, this refers to him marrying the daughters of Saul, which he definitely did. The matter of polygamy still stands, though, and in this case, it's an important one. In Deuteronomy, God set up some rules for the future monarchy, and among those rules was the rule that the king shall not "multiply wives". While this may mean that he should not have an excessive amount of wives rather than an outright ban on polygamy, David had probably somewhere around a dozen wives, and of course his son Solomon was famous for having 700 wives and 300 concubines, so I think both of them--but certainly the latter--qualify as having excess here. (Actually, David and Solomon disobeyed a lot of those rules for kings, if you read through them; and it became their downfall, really.)
The remaining two verses come the closest to endorsing polygamy in the Bible, but I think they need to be looked at in full rather than in the part that are quoted on the polygamy page.
While these two verses allow for polygamy, the main point of both is a provocative one. God is saying to the men of Israel that they are only allowed to take another wife if they can keep themselves from playing favorites. Consider in particular the phrase "her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish." I could be wrong, but I think God is saying that if you have sex with your wife four times a week, that doesn't mean getting a second wife means you can sleep with each one twice a week; you need to keep your first wife's, ahem, "duty of marriage" at the same level. 'Nuff said."If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish." -Exodus 21:10
"If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated: Then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn: But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his." -Deuteronomy 21:15-17
This presents an interesting challenge to the would-be polygamist. Can you not only treat all your wives the same, but keep treating your first wife just as good as you did when she was your only wife? That's a tall order! I'm going to take a tangent into the Quran for a moment, and call your attention to this page. Although I have done it on the SAB forums a couple times, this will be my first time here in the blog: I'm going to defend the Quran in this matter. Note that the first verse is a conditional! A friend of mine, who is not a Muslim (or a Christian, but apparently is as much interested in religion as I am if not more) tells me that some Muslims, and in particular the laws of the country of Morocco, take this apparent contradiction to be an implicit ban on polygamy!
Statement: You may have a second wife if you can treat both your wives fairly and equally.
Statement: It is not possible for a man to treat two wives fairly and equally.
Conclusion: You may not have a second wife.
Getting back to the Bible, by similar logic it is concluded by many that while the Bible does not explicitly state that polygamy is a sin, it is implied by the Bible that anything other than a lifelong monogamous commitment between one man and one woman is less than God's ideal, and will lead to heartache.

8 comments:
"I don't believe that polygamy is a sin." The problem with the bible is that different people have different beliefs about what it says.
Is that a problem with the Bible, or a problem with us? I don't ask that question rhetorically, either; I'm curious what you think about it. Isn't it a fact of life in the way language, intelligence, and communication work that the transfer of information between two beings is always limited? Sure, some people have insisted that a book written by God should transcend this tendancy (and maybe you yourself are trying to assert that position), but how do we know this is so?
You wrote: "Solomon was famous for having 300 wives and 700 concubines...".
Really?
I thought it was the other way around - 700 wives / 300 concubines.
You know, like it sez in the Bibo.
Simple factual errors like this do seem to undermine one's credibility and authority, don't you think?
You're correct, I got it backwards. I'm not sure how much one needs to worry about undermining one's credibility through small errors. They're easy enough to fix, aren't that vital (the point is that Solomon was a polygamist, the number doesn't matter so much), and I've personally never claimed to be a difinitive authority on anything of importance anyway.
Hi. I think your analysis of the Bible's position on polygamy is very well done. Please consider these four points:
Point 1:
Deut 17:16 in the NASB says: "Moreover, he shall not multiply horses for himself," Note that the wording of version 16 is exactly the same wording in verse 17.
If Deut 17:17 means the King is not to have more than one wife, then does 17:16 mean the King is not to have more than one horse?
Point 2.
The meaning of Deut 17:17 is more clear in The New International Version, the English Standard Version, and the Holman Christian Standard Bible. They all say
essentially the same thing: the King must not acquire many wifes for himself. Therefore Deut 17:17 does not prohibit the King from taking multiple wives.
Point 3.
You have stated elsewhere that the Bible does not approve of polygamy.
I refer you to 2 Samuel 12:8. The New International Version, the English Standard Version, and the Holman Christian Standard Bible all agree in their translation of what God says to David in this passage:
that God gave Saul's wives into David's arms. It appears that Because God gave Saul's wives to
David, God gave tacit approval to David's polygamy.
Point 4.
You have stated elsewhere:
"I was told by a pastor once that you will find no example of a polygamist in the Bible that didn't have trouble come about from his polygamy, and from what I have read, it's true."
I refer you to Judges 8:29, which says that Jerub-Baal (Gideon) had many wives. As far as I can tell, the Bible does not record that Gideon suffered any trouble from his polygamy.
You make some good points. In general, let me reiterate what I said, that I don't believe polygamy is a sin. In specific, let me address your points one by one.
#1: I didn't claim that Deut. 17:17 is an outright ban on polygamy, but rather a matter of reasonable limitation. Even if you allow for polygamy to be legally and morally allowed, it seems to me that there is a point where you've gone beyond being a polygamist and you're in the realm of being a showoff. Where is that line? I don't know, but I feel pretty confident that Solomon was well beyond it.
And furthermore, the same thing goes for horses anyway. How many horses does a person really need? Unless you're a person whose profession requires the use of multiple horses, (which I don't think being king qualifies) more than one or two per member of your household is just ostentatiousness.
#2: Okay, so? I agree.
#3: I think that passage has a lot more to do with punishment for Saul than reward for David, but you may have something there.
#4: I'm talking more big picture. Gideon was not recorded to have been personally harmed by his polygamy, but did you read Judges chapter 9? Gideon's son Abimelech killed about 70 of his half-brothers. Not exactly a happy family. All throughout the Bible, you see a lot more strife between men who are half-brothers than full brothers.
I for one am disturbed by God's claim that he 'gave' Saul's wives to David. To make it worse, for me anyhow, is God saying 'if you'd wanted MORE all you had to do was say so'. This is GOD openly handing women over to somebody as if they were no more than livestock. I truly don't know what to do with this.
I'm largely with you on that one in many ways. Culturally, David lived in a time when women had very few individual rights, and yes, women were treated with just slightly more respect than livestock by many people.
However, from the point of view of someone who views God as sovereign over all things, there is nothing that should worry one about the use of the verb "gave". I believe that even here in the modern time in which we live, God "gave" my wife to me. This is not at all sexist, as God also "gave" me to her. To a theist, everything is a gift from God, even the people in our lives.
Post a Comment